DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Integra vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
IntegraModelCronos
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
180 HPPower140 HP
175 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4695 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1335 mmHeight1400 mm
1200 KgWeight1170 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Integra and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…