DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Honda FIT vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
HondaMakeMazda
FITModel3
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
143 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
3830 mmLength4420 mm
1675 mmWidth1755 mm
1525 mmHeight1465 mm
1010 KgWeight1275 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Honda FIT and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…