2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2004 Honda FIT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Honda
FIT
Honda FIT 1.5 i 16V (110 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHonda FIT
FordMakeHonda
C-MaxModelFIT
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHonda FIT
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
240 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHonda FIT
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHonda FIT
4330 mmLength3830 mm
1820 mmWidth1675 mm
1600 mmHeight1525 mm
1292 KgWeight1010 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2004 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…