DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 SsangYong XLV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda FIT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSsangYong
FITModelXLV
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
132 HPPower128 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
185/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1798 mm
1525 mmHeight1605 mm
1050 KgWeight1345 kg
—Luggage capacity720 lt
2530 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda FIT

No additional feature records are available.

SsangYong XLVDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 SsangYong XLV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda FIT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…