DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Honda FIT vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSmart
FITModelForfour
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1339 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
86 HPPower95 HP
119 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14 STyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3830 mmLength3752 mm
1675 mmWidth1684 mm
1525 mmHeight1450 mm
980 KgWeight965 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Honda FIT and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…