DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeHonda
ForfourModelFIT
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1339 cc
95 HPPower86 HP
210 NmTorque119 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3830 mm
1684 mmWidth1675 mm
1450 mmHeight1525 mm
965 KgWeight980 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…