DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda FIT vs 2017 Seat Arona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Arona
HondaMakeSeat
FITModelArona
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Arona
—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1317 ccEngine displacement999 cc
100 HPPower115 HP
119 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Arona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Arona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/70 R14Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/55 R17; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Arona
3955 mmLength4138 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1525 mmHeight1552 mm
1000 KgWeight1112 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2566 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda FIT and 2017 Seat Arona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…