DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda FIT vs 2017 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda FIT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.

61.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationMG ZS
HondaMakeMG
FITModelZS
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationMG ZS
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1317 ccEngine displacement999 cc
100 HPPower111 HP
119 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15; 215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationMG ZS
3955 mmLength4314 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1525 mmHeight1636 mm
1000 KgWeight1231 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2585 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda FIT and 2017 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda FIT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…