DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda CRX vs 1996 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSeat
CRXModelAlhambra
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
182 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
144 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4005 mmLength4617 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1255 mmHeight1728 mm
1000 KgWeight1754 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda CRX and 1996 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…