DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Honda CRX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda CRX
HondaMakeHonda
Sm-xModelCRX
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda CRX
7,2 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
186 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda CRX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda CRX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 H

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda CRX
3950 mmLength4005 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1750 mmHeight1255 mm
1330 KgWeight1000 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Honda CRX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…