DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda CRX vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda CRXSpecificationHonda Sm-x
HondaMakeHonda
CRXModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeMinivan
2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

Honda CRXSpecificationHonda Sm-x
8,7 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
144 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda CRXSpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Honda CRXSpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14 HTyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

Honda CRXSpecificationHonda Sm-x
4005 mmLength3950 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1255 mmHeight1750 mm
1000 KgWeight1330 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda CRX and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…