DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda CR-Z vs 2012 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMini
CR-ZModelConvertible
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower122 HP
145 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4078 mmLength3723 mm
2013 mmWidth1683 mm
1395 mmHeight1414 mm
1147 KgWeight1165 Kg
2435 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda CR-Z and 2012 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…