DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 5 vs 2012 Honda CR-Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 5SpecificationHonda CR-Z
MazdaMakeHonda
5ModelCR-Z
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeCoupe
7Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 5SpecificationHonda CR-Z
11,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 5SpecificationHonda CR-Z
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 5SpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 5SpecificationHonda CR-Z
4585 mmLength4078 mm
1750 mmWidth2013 mm
1615 mmHeight1395 mm
1415 KgWeight1147 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2435 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 5 and 2012 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…