DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda CR-Z vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeCitroen
CR-ZModelC3
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
145 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4078 mmLength3941 mm
2013 mmWidth1728 mm
1395 mmHeight1524 mm
1147 KgWeight1075 Kg
2435 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda CR-Z and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…