DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda CR-V vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
CR-VModelASX
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed194 km/h
2199 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4295 mm
1820 mmWidth1770 mm
1675 mmHeight1625 mm
1713 KgWeight1360 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda CR-V and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…