DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Honda CR-V vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeJeep
CR-VModelCompass
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
190 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2199 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4448 mm
1820 mmWidth1812 mm
1675 mmHeight1718 mm
1713 KgWeight1680 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Honda CR-V and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…