DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda CR-V vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda CR-VSpecificationMG ZS
HondaMakeMG
CR-VModelZS
2002Model year2002
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Honda CR-VSpecificationMG ZS
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
177 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
147 HPPower117 HP
182 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda CR-VSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda CR-VSpecificationMG ZS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda CR-VSpecificationMG ZS
4520 mmLength4520 mm
1750 mmWidth1700 mm
1675 mmHeight1390 mm
1490 KgWeight1125 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda CR-V and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…