DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda CR-V vs 2016 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

64.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeNissan
CR-VModelX-Trail
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
182 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower130 HP
300 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/60 R18Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4605 mmLength4640 mm
2096 mmWidth1820 mm
1685 mmHeight1715 mm
1545 KgWeight1505-1550 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda CR-V and 2016 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…