DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHonda
C-MaxModelCR-V
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
188 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
159 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4379 mmLength4605 mm
1858 mmWidth2096 mm
1610 mmHeight1685 mm
1374 kgWeight1545 Kg
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2630 mm

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Honda CR-V

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…