DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.5–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Storm
AudiMakeGeo
100ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Storm
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
88 HPPower95 HP
146 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Storm
4793 mmLength4150 mm
1814 mmWidth1695 mm
1422 mmHeight1300 mm
1130 KgWeight1035 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…