DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.5–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationAudi 100
GeoMakeAudi
StormModel100
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationAudi 100
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
95 HPPower88 HP
131 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank80 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationAudi 100
4150 mmLength4793 mm
1695 mmWidth1814 mm
1300 mmHeight1422 mm
1035 KgWeight1130 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…