1998 • Honda
Civic
Honda Civic 1.6 16V (116 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.5/100
1998 Honda Civic vs 1998 Geo Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1998Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Honda Civic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda CivicSpecificationGeo Tracker
HondaMakeGeo
CivicModelTracker
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Honda CivicSpecificationGeo Tracker
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
116 HPPower97 HP
143 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda CivicSpecificationGeo Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Honda CivicSpecificationGeo Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears3
185/60 R14Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Honda CivicSpecificationGeo Tracker
4325 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1390 mmHeight—
1155 KgWeight—
2620 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Honda Civic and 1998 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…