1998 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1.6i (112 Hp) 1998Overall Score53.25/100
1998 Rover 400 vs 1998 Honda Civic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Honda
Civic
Honda Civic 1.6 16V (116 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 400SpecificationHonda Civic
RoverMakeHonda
400ModelCivic
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Rover 400SpecificationHonda Civic
10,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
112 HPPower116 HP
138 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 400SpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 400SpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 400SpecificationHonda Civic
4365 mmLength4325 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1390 mm
1125 KgWeight1155 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Rover 400 and 1998 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…