DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda Brio vs 2016 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Brio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeNissan
BrioModelMicra
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
88 HPPower80 HP
109 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
175/65 R14Tyre size14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3610 mmLength3825 mm
1680 mmWidth1665 mm
1500 mmHeight1510 mm
920 KgWeight945 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2345 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda Brio

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda Brio and 2016 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Brio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…