DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda Brio vs 2016 Mitsubishi Attrage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Brio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
BrioModelAttrage
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
88 HPPower80 HP
109 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3610 mmLength4245 mm
1680 mmWidth1670 mm
1500 mmHeight1515 mm
920 KgWeight930 kg
—Luggage capacity450 lt
2345 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda Brio

No additional feature records are available.

Mitsubishi AttrageDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda Brio and 2016 Mitsubishi Attrage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Brio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…