2013 • Honda
Accord
Honda Accord 2.0 (199 Hp) 2013Overall Score66.25/100
2013 Honda Accord vs 2013 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2013Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Honda Accord
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda AccordSpecificationFord Ranger
HondaMakeFord
AccordModelRanger
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Honda AccordSpecificationFord Ranger
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
183 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1993 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
165 NmTorque375 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda AccordSpecificationFord Ranger
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank80 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Honda AccordSpecificationFord Ranger
—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Honda AccordSpecificationFord Ranger
4915 mmLength5359 mm
1849 mmWidth1850 mm
1466 mmHeight1815 mm
1723 KgWeight2048 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Honda Accord and 2013 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…