DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Countryman vs 2013 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeHonda
CountrymanModelAccord
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4/5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
143 HPPower143 HP
305 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
47 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/55 R17 91V RSCTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4915 mm
1789 mmWidth1849 mm
1561 mmHeight1466 mm
1320 KgWeight1723 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Countryman and 2013 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…