DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden UTE vs 1999 Holden Statesman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelStatesman
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
304 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4990 mm
1794 mmWidth1795 mm
1448 mmHeight1420 mm
1450 KgWeight1520 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden UTE and 1999 Holden Statesman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…