DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Omega vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
OmegaModelUTE
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
216 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
304 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4880 mmLength4861 mm
1825 mmWidth1794 mm
1440 mmHeight1448 mm
1640 KgWeight1450 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Omega and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…