2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.8i V6 (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Holden UTE vs 2000 Chrysler Voyager Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chrysler
Voyager
Chrysler Voyager 3.8 i AWD (166 Hp) 2000Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Chrysler Voyager
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationChrysler Voyager
HoldenMakeChrysler
UTEModelVoyager
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors4
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationChrysler Voyager
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
200 HPPower166 HP
304 NmTorque308 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationChrysler Voyager
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationChrysler Voyager
4861 mmLength4733 mm
1794 mmWidth1950 mm
1448 mmHeight1740 mm
1450 KgWeight2000 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2878 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden UTE and 2000 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Omega vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableHolden Statesman vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsVSImage unavailableChrysler Voyager vs Holden UTE2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Impala vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…