DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
UTEModelImpala
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower203 HP
304 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5080 mm
1794 mmWidth1855 mm
1448 mmHeight1455 mm
1450 KgWeight1560 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden UTE and 2000 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…