DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Impala vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
ImpalaModelUTE
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
203 HPPower200 HP
305 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5080 mmLength4861 mm
1855 mmWidth1794 mm
1455 mmHeight1448 mm
1560 KgWeight1450 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Impala and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…