DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2005 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChrysler
UTEModelVoyager
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
215 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
224 HPPower218 HP
370 NmTorque332 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4805 mm
1794 mmWidth1995 mm
1448 mmHeight1750 mm
1450 KgWeight1800 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2005 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…