DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
GalantModelUTE
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
230 HPPower224 HP
250 NmTorque370 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4861 mm
1840 mmWidth1794 mm
1485 mmHeight1448 mm
1560 KgWeight1450 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi Galant and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…