DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden UTE vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelUTE
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
215 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
224 HPPower224 HP
370 NmTorque370 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4861 mm
1794 mmWidth1794 mm
1448 mmHeight1448 mm
1450 KgWeight1450 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden UTE and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…