1999 • Holden
Caprice
Holden Caprice 3.8 i V6 SC (233 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
1999 Holden Caprice vs 2000 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.8 i V6 S (224 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden UTE
HoldenMakeHolden
CapriceModelUTE
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden UTE
—0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower224 HP
375 NmTorque370 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden UTE
5237 mmLength4861 mm
1847 mmWidth1794 mm
1459 mmHeight1448 mm
1722 KgWeight1450 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden Caprice and 2000 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…