DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden UTE vs 1999 Chrysler LHS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChrysler
UTEModelLHS
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
224 HPPower218 HP
370 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5268 mm
1794 mmWidth1890 mm
1448 mmHeight1416 mm
1450 KgWeight1610 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden UTE and 1999 Chrysler LHS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…