DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelCalais
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
215 km/hTop speed226 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
224 HPPower233 HP
370 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4964 mm
1794 mmWidth1842 mm
1448 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1655 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden UTE and 2000 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…