DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Holden UTE vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMazda
UTEModelCX-9
2012Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
265 HPPower273 HP
340 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength5232 mm
1899 mmWidth1935 mm
1480 mmHeight1727 mm
1735 KgWeight1958 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Holden UTE and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…