DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2012 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
CX-9ModelUTE
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
273 HPPower265 HP
270 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5040 mm
1935 mmWidth1899 mm
1727 mmHeight1480 mm
1958 KgWeight1735 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…