DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Holden UTE vs 2009 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeJeep
UTEModelWrangler
2010Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
245 HPPower196 HP
330 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
—Tyre size255/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4751 mm
1899 mmWidth1877 mm
1497 mmHeight1834 mm
1697 KgWeight1895 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Holden UTE and 2009 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…