2009 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2009Overall Score74.5/100
2009 Jeep Wrangler vs 2010 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (245 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationHolden UTE
JeepMakeHolden
WranglerModelUTE
2009Model year2010
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationHolden UTE
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
196 HPPower245 HP
315 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,9 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep WranglerSpecificationHolden UTE
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/75 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationHolden UTE
4751 mmLength5055 mm
1877 mmWidth1899 mm
1834 mmHeight1497 mm
1895 KgWeight1697 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3009 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jeep Wrangler and 2010 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…