DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Suburban vs 2000 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeGMC
SuburbanModelYukon
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5735 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
255 HPPower288 HP
330 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
158 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,8 lt
18 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5588 mmLength5029 mm
1956 mmWidth2004 mm
1803 mmHeight1943 mm
2121 KgWeight2350 Kg
3340 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Suburban and 2000 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…