DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Expedition vs 2000 Holden Suburban Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExpeditionModelSuburban
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5735 cc
264 HPPower255 HP
474 NmTorque330 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
113 ltFuel tank158 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption—
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption18 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5198 mmLength5588 mm
1996 mmWidth1956 mm
1992 mmHeight1803 mm
2555 KgWeight2121 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase3340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Expedition and 2000 Holden Suburban approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…