DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Suburban vs 2000 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
SuburbanModelExpedition
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
5735 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
255 HPPower264 HP
330 NmTorque474 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
158 ltFuel tank113 lt
—Urban consumption19,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption14,7 lt
18 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5588 mmLength5198 mm
1956 mmWidth1996 mm
1803 mmHeight1992 mm
2121 KgWeight2555 Kg
3340 mmWheelbase3023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Suburban and 2000 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…