DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden Frontera vs 2003 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
FronteraModelPathfinder
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
192 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
205 HPPower220 HP
290 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
17 ltUrban consumption18,7 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
—Average consumption14,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
—Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4640 mm
1785 mmWidth1820 mm
1690 mmHeight1750 mm
1785 KgWeight1950 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden Frontera and 2003 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…