DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden Frontera vs 2003 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLancia
FronteraModelPhedra
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
192 km/hTop speed205 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
205 HPPower204 HP
290 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4750 mm
1785 mmWidth1863 mm
1690 mmHeight1760 mm
1785 KgWeight1760 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden Frontera and 2003 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…