DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Frontera vs 2000 Chevrolet Alero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
FronteraModelAlero
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
192 km/hTop speed201 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
205 HPPower177 HP
290 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank57 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,2 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4740 mm
1785 mmWidth1780 mm
1690 mmHeight1400 mm
1785 KgWeight1485 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Frontera and 2000 Chevrolet Alero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…