DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Frontera vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeVolkswagen
FronteraModelSharan
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
192 km/hTop speed214 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
205 HPPower204 HP
290 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption14,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4634 mm
1785 mmWidth1810 mm
1690 mmHeight1730 mm
1785 KgWeight1840 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2841 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Frontera and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…