DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Frontera vs 2000 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeDaewoo
FronteraModelMusso
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
192 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
205 HPPower220 HP
290 NmTorque307 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
17 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size255/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4640 mm
1785 mmWidth1864 mm
1690 mmHeight1735 mm
1785 KgWeight1935 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Frontera and 2000 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…